CPU
GPU
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $850 versus $1,750 for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition, it costs 51% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 123.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+123.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,750) | ✅More affordable ($850) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2452 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,587 points. Launch price was $749.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition scores 30,020 versus the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's 32,587 — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti leads by 8.6%. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 8,960 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Raw compute: 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 43.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1432 MHz vs 2452 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 70 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) with 280 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,020 | 32,587+9% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960 | 8960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 25.66 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1432 MHz | 2452 MHz+71% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 280 | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB | 8.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 70 |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | 280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 6th Gen vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th Gen | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's 300W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 167mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 88 C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-77% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 167mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-18% | 88 C |
| Perf/Watt | 428.9+295% | 108.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1750, while the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti launched at $749 and now averages $850. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti costs 51.4% less ($900 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 38.3 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers 122.7% better value.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $749-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1750 | $850-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 38.3+123% |
| Codename | GB203 | GB203 |
| Release | August 11 2025 | February 20 2025 |
| Ranking | #17 | #9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
