
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition vs GeForce RTX 4090 D

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,599 versus $1,750 for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition, it costs 9% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 12% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+12%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,750) | ✅More affordable ($1,599) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition and GeForce RTX 4090 D

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.

GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition scores 30,020 and the GeForce RTX 4090 D reaches 30,725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4090 D uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Raw compute: 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Boost clocks: 1432 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 114 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) with 280 Tensor cores vs 456.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,020 | 30,725+2% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960 | 14592+63% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 25.66 TFLOPS | 73.54 TFLOPS+187% |
| Boost Clock | 1432 MHz | 2520 MHz+76% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 280 | 456+63% |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB | 14.3 MB+63% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 114+63% |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | 456+63% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 24 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Decoder: NVDEC 6th Gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th Gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 425W — a 143.4% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-84% | 425W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-24% | 850W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-8% | 78°C |
| Perf/Watt | 428.9+493% | 72.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1750, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1599-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1750 | — |
| Codename | GB203 | AD102 |
| Release | August 11 2025 | December 28 2023 |
| Ranking | #17 | #14 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














