RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

133%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

132%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

128%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

125%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

115%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

113%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

111%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

109%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

108%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

106%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

102%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

100%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

96%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

95%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

94%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

93%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

91%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

89%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

82%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

78%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

68%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 236.7% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (24 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+236.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-236.7%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (24 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,700 for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell, it costs 96% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 573.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+573.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,700)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell and GeForce GTX 1650

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell scores 26,498 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 236.7%. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2055 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	26,498+237%	7,869
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	8960+900%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	36.83 TFLOPS+1134%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2055 MHz+23%	1665 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	280+400%	56
L1 Cache	8.8 MB+900%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+4700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 237.5% advantage for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+500%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	432 GB/s+238%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+4700%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	9th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	6th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell draws 140W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 60.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	140W	75W-46%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	189.3+80%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1700, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 95.6% less ($1625 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.6 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 572.4% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).