RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4080
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4080
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (24 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4080.
| Insight | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce RTX 4080
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,929 points.
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile scores 35,929 and the GeForce RTX 4080 reaches 34,445 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4080 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 10,496 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080). Raw compute: 35.27 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4080) with 328 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35,929+4% | 34,445 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+8% | 9728 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.27 TFLOPS | 48.74 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2505 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 112 | 112 |
| TMUs | 328+8% | 304 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+8% | 9.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+8% | 76 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+8% | 304 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4080 has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) — a 39.1% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+39% | 736 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Blackwell) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080). Decoder: NVDEC (Blackwell) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080).
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Blackwell) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Blackwell) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile draws 95W versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 320W — a 108.4% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4080). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 310mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-70% | 320W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 310mm |
| Height | 0mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 378.2+251% | 107.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $800 |
| Codename | GB203 | AD103 |
| Release | March 19 2025 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #106 | #7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce RTX 4080
