RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs GeForce RTX 5090
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (32 GB vs 24 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile.
| Insight | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 5090 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce RTX 5090
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,929 points.
GeForce RTX 5090
The GeForce RTX 5090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,867 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile scores 35,929 versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 38,867 — the GeForce RTX 5090 leads by 8.2%. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 5090 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 10,496 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090). Raw compute: 35.27 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 170 (GeForce RTX 5090) with 328 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35,929 | 38,867+8% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496 | 21760+107% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.27 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+197% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2407 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 328 | 680+107% |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB | 21.3 MB+107% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 96 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | 170+107% |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 680+107% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5090 has 32 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 5090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 32 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 512-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 96 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5090). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Blackwell) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5090). Decoder: NVDEC (Blackwell) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5090).
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Blackwell) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Blackwell) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile draws 95W versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 575W — a 143.3% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-83% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-35% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 378.2+459% | 67.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce RTX 5090
