RTXA5000-6Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
RTXA5000-6Q
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTXA5000-6Q is positioned at rank #374 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-6Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTXA5000-6Q uses modern memory architecture. The RTXA5000-6Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTXA5000-6Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Insight | RTXA5000-6Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $2,500 for the RTXA5000-6Q, it costs 99% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 16325.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTXA5000-6Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+16325.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,500) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTXA5000-6Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650
RTXA5000-6Q
The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTXA5000-6Q scores 1,522 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTXA5000-6Q is built on Ampere while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,522+1% | 1,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 8192+2033% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.77 TFLOPS+3044% | 0.8832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz+47% | 1150 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1500% | 6 |
| TMUs | 256+433% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTXA5000-6Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 0 MB. The RTXA5000-6Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The RTXA5000-6Q draws 230W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 175.5% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.6 | 100.0+1415% |
Value Analysis
The RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2500, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 costs 99.4% less ($2485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers 16566.7% better value. The RTXA5000-6Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2500 | $15-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | 100.0+16567% |
| Codename | GA102 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #53 | #718 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTXA5000-6Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650
