RTXA5000-8Q vs GeForce GTX 1050
RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTXA5000-8Q is positioned at rank #295 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-8Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTXA5000-8Q uses modern memory architecture. The RTXA5000-8Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-8Q.
| Insight | RTXA5000-8Q | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $2,500 for the RTXA5000-8Q, it costs 98% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 5587.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTXA5000-8Q | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5587.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,500) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTXA5000-8Q and GeForce GTX 1050
RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
GeForce GTX 1050
The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The RTXA5000-8Q scores 4,916 and the GeForce GTX 1050 reaches 5,033 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTXA5000-8Q is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1050 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050). Raw compute: 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1392 MHz.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,916 | 5,033+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 8192+1180% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.77 TFLOPS+1391% | 1.862 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz+22% | 1392 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+540% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 8 MB+3378% | 0.23 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RTXA5000-8Q draws 230W versus the GeForce GTX 1050's 60W — a 117.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 60W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65 C |
| Perf/Watt | 21.4 | 83.9+292% |
Value Analysis
The RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2500, while the GeForce GTX 1050 launched at $110 and now averages $45. The GeForce GTX 1050 costs 98.2% less ($2455 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 111.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 5490% better value. The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $110-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2500 | $45-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 111.8+5490% |
| Codename | GA102 | GP107 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #53 | #443 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTXA5000-8Q and GeForce GTX 1050
