
RTXA5000-8Q vs M1 8-Core GPU

RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTXA5000-8Q is positioned at rank #295 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-8Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The M1 8-Core GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-8Q.
| Insight | RTXA5000-8Q | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Legacy (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the M1 8-Core GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTXA5000-8Q and M1 8-Core GPU

RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTXA5000-8Q scores 4,916 and the M1 8-Core GPU reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,916 | 5,000+2% |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8192+102300% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | Unified |
Power & Dimensions
The RTXA5000-8Q draws 230W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W — a 153.8% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 21.4 | 166.7+679% |
Value Analysis
The RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2500, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($2500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) — the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA102 | — |
| Release | April 12 2021 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #53 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














