Radeon RX 7600 vs FirePro W6150M
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
FirePro W6150M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W6150M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W6150M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 603.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W6150M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+603.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-603.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and FirePro W6150M
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
FirePro W6150M
The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the FirePro W6150M's 2,358 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 603.2%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the FirePro W6150M uses GCN 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 768 (FirePro W6150M). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+603% | 2,358 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+1217% | 1.651 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro W6150M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W6150M has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W6150M) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the FirePro W6150M's 150W — a 9.5% difference. The FirePro W6150M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (FirePro W6150M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 150W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 105mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+540% | 15.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Saturn |
| Release | May 24 2023 | November 12 2015 |
| Ranking | #118 | #646 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and FirePro W6150M
