GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs FirePro W6150M
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
FirePro W6150M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W6150M
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than FirePro W6150M?
The matchup between the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the legacy mobile professional FirePro W6150M reveals a monumental divide between modern power and previous-gen workstation efficiency. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 3000% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip that can handle basic design tasks to a desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB of VRAM and specialized hardware for Path Tracing and DLSS 3. The FirePro W6150M is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count or features to handle modern software at playable rates. Moving from any notebook to a 40-series Ti desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and visual stability needed for the most demanding digital environments in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The FirePro W6150M is strictly piece of hardware history. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly world-class, the 16 GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W6150M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 860.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W6150M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+860.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-860.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and FirePro W6150M
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
FirePro W6150M
The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the FirePro W6150M's 2,358 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 860.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the FirePro W6150M uses GCN 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 (FirePro W6150M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+861% | 2,358 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+467% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1236% | 1.651 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+183% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+2163% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro W6150M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W6150M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W6150M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W6150M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the FirePro W6150M's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The FirePro W6150M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (FirePro W6150M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 105mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+802% | 15.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Saturn |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 12 2015 |
| Ranking | #59 | #646 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and FirePro W6150M
