Radeon RX 7600 vs GeForce MX250
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
GeForce MX250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 598.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX250.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+598.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-598.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 318.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX250.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+318.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce MX250
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the GeForce MX250's 2,375 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 598.1%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce MX250 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 384 (GeForce MX250). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+598% | 2,375 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+2628% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+156% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+256% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX250 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX250 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) vs 48 GB/s (GeForce MX250) — a 500% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX250) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+500% | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs None (GeForce MX250). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the GeForce MX250's 10W — a 177.1% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (GeForce MX250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 10W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 237.5+136% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce MX250 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce MX250 costs 40% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 15.8 (GeForce MX250) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 319.6% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $150-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $150-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+320% | 15.8 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GP108B |
| Release | May 24 2023 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #118 | #643 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce MX250
