
Radeon RX 7600 vs Iris Plus Graphics

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:

Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 0). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 826.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+826.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-826.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 48.3% better value per dollar than the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+48.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Iris Plus Graphics

Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 1,789 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 826.8%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 6 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+827% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+2024% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+166% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 166.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 119.3+19% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 84% less ($210 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 48.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $100-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $40-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+48% | 44.7 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #118 | #714 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















