GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Iris Plus Graphics
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 0). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1665.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1665.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1665.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 19.7% better value per dollar than the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Iris Plus Graphics
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 1,789 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 1665.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 4 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+1665% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+1400% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+3815% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+161% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+900% | 8 |
| TMUs | 240+650% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs QuickSync.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 180% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 285mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 285mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 119.3+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 93.2% less ($550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 19.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $100-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $40-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+20% | 44.7 |
| Codename | AD104 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #11 | #714 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Iris Plus Graphics
