Radeon RX 7600 vs Quadro RTX 8000
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 8000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20.2% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7600.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+20.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+500%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $9,999 for the Quadro RTX 8000, it costs 97% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 3228% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3228%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($9,999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Quadro RTX 8000
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 19,927 — the Quadro RTX 8000 leads by 20.2%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 576.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581 | 19,927+20% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4608+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+33% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+50% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 288+125% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4.5 MB+800% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 72+125% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 166.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 768 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 44.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-37% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+31% | 76.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 and now averages $9999. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 97.5% less ($9749 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 3215% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269-97% | $9999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-97% | $9999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+3215% | 2.0 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | TU102 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #118 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Quadro RTX 8000
