GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro RTX 8000
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 8000
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro RTX 8000?
The battle between the professional flagship Quadro RTX 8000 and the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB highlights the choice between uncompromised mission-critical scale and next-gen AI-driven efficiency. The Quadro RTX 8000 remains an iconic monster featuring roughly 20-30% more raw compute muscle and professional certified drivers for enterprise-grade datasets.
Technically, the Quadro RTX 8000 wins on absolute scale with its colossal 48GB VRAM buffer—tripling the 16GB found on the newer card—along with a 384-bit bus for pathological texture streaming. However, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features superior Ada Lovelace efficiency and introduces the revolutionary DLSS 3 Frame Generation that provide significantly more fluidity in demanding modern titles. Moving between these two is a choice between world-class industrial memory scale and the latest stationary AI innovation. For any facility requiring uncompromised memory depth in 2026, the 48GB Turing flagship remains the definitive choice.
The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 is the undisputed winner in absolute memory capacity and workstation stability. it is a world-class tool for high-end industrial workflows. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the winner for modern activists and enthusiasts who priority the latest technological features and uncompromised productivity value on a budget. however, for any rig requiring uncompromised memory scale and industrial muscle, the 48GB workstation card is the CLEAR and superior winner.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 8000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+13.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-13.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+500%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $9,999 for the Quadro RTX 8000, it costs 96% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2891% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2891%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($380) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($9,999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro RTX 8000
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 19,927 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 13.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+14% | 19,927 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4608+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+35% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+43% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 288+112% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 4.5 MB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 72+112% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 576+324% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro RTX 8000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 166.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 768 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-38% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+85% | 76.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 and now averages $9999. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 96.2% less ($9619 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2880% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-96% | $9999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380-96% | $9999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+2880% | 2.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | TU102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #59 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro RTX 8000
