Radeon RX 7600 vs Radeon X1600 Pro
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Radeon X1600 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600 Pro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16648.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1600 Pro.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+16648.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16648.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3182.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1600 Pro.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3182.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon X1600 Pro
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Radeon X1600 Pro
The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 99 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 16648.5%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+16648% | 99 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+240% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+70% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon X1600 Pro lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 Pro has 512 MB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+36% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+119% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs None (Radeon X1600 Pro). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon X1600 Pro).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon X1600 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 150W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+14257% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149 and now averages $49. The Radeon X1600 Pro costs 80.4% less ($201 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2.0 (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 3215% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $149-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $49-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+3215% | 2.0 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #118 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon X1600 Pro
