Ryzen 3 1300X vs Core i5-10400F
Ryzen 3 1300X
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Ryzen 3 1300X is positioned at rank #396 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 1300X
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 3 1300X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($54) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 3 1300X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+0%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($54) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 1300X and Core i5-10400F
Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 1300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 15% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1300X scores 6,923 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 61.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,486 vs 8,191 (80.6% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,120 vs 1,454, a 26% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,155 vs 5,783 (58.8% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+17% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 6,923 | 13,029+88% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,486 | 8,191+135% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,120 | 1,454+30% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,155 | 5,783+83% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 3 1300X) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Ryzen 3 1300X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,X570 (Ryzen 3 1300X) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 3 1300X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 1300X launched at $129 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($54 vs $102), the Ryzen 3 1300X is $48 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 1300X delivers 128.2 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Ryzen 3 1300X the 0.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-19% | $160 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $54-47% | $102 |
| Performance per Dollar | 128.2 | 127.7 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 3 1300X and Core i5-10400F
