Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240 v3

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 3200G

4 / 4

6,999

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1240 v3

4 / 8

7,001

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 3200G

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E3-1240 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1240 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,999 vs 7,001).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1240 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1240 v3

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1240 v3 better than Ryzen 3 3200G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 3200G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1240 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1240 v3 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1240 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 3200G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,999 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 3200G

The Ryzen 3 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,999 points. Launch price was $99.

Xeon E3-1240 v3

The Xeon E3-1240 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,001 points. Launch price was $300.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1240 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200G versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v3 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3200G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3200G scores 6,999 against the Xeon E3-1240 v3's 7,001 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v3. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200G vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3200G	Xeon E3-1240 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+5%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+6%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	6,999	7,001

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.