Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-1620 v3
Ryzen 3 3200G
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 3200G
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620 v3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 3 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($67) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($189) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 3 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+184%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($67) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($189) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon E5-1620 v3
Ryzen 3 3200G
The Ryzen 3 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,999 points. Launch price was $99.
Xeon E5-1620 v3
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,959 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 3200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1620 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200G versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3200G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3200G scores 6,999 against the Xeon E5-1620 v3's 6,959 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 3200G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200G vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,999 | 6,959 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon E5-1620 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 3200G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-1620 v3). PCIe lanes: 12 (Ryzen 3 3200G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-1620 v3) — the Xeon E5-1620 v3 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 300 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 3 3200G) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-1620 v3).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 40+233% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 3200G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1620 v3). The Ryzen 3 3200G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-1620 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 3200G launched at $100 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 debuted at $294. At current prices ($67 vs $189), the Ryzen 3 3200G is $122 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 3200G delivers 104.5 pts/$ vs 36.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — making the Ryzen 3 3200G the 95.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-66% | $294 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $67-65% | $189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.5+184% | 36.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon E5-1620 v3
