Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-1620 v3

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 3 3200G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5-1620 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 3200G

4 / 4

6,999

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-1620 v3

4 / 8

6,959

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-1620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 3200G

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 195.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 70.0 vs 23.7 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-1620 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1620 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-1620 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 12.
✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,959 vs 6,999).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.7 vs 70.0 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 3200G better than Xeon E5-1620 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1620 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 3200G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3200G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 3200G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 3200G comes in $194 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1620 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 195.7% better value on MSRP (70.0 vs 23.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 3200G

The Ryzen 3 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,999 points. Launch price was $99.

Xeon E5-1620 v3

The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,959 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1620 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200G versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3200G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3200G scores 6,999 against the Xeon E5-1620 v3's 6,959 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 3200G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200G vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3200G	Xeon E5-1620 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	6,999	6,959

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 3 3200G versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — the Ryzen 3 3200G supports 37.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-1620 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 3200G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-1620 v3). PCIe lanes: 12 (Ryzen 3 3200G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-1620 v3) — the Xeon E5-1620 v3 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 300 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 3 3200G) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-1620 v3).

Feature	Ryzen 3 3200G	Xeon E5-1620 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+38%	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	40+233%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 3200G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1620 v3). The Ryzen 3 3200G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-1620 v3 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3200G	Xeon E5-1620 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Vega 8	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 3200G was priced at $100, while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($100 vs $294), Ryzen 3 3200G was $194 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 3200G delivers 70.0 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — making the Ryzen 3 3200G the 98.9% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3200G	Xeon E5-1620 v3
MSRP	$100-66%	$294
Performance per Dollar	70.0+195%	23.7
Release Date	2019	2014

Search Ryzen 3 3200G on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-1620 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.