
Ryzen 3 7440U

Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 3 7440U vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 7440U vs Ryzen 5 2600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 7440U vs Ryzen 5 2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 7440U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,100 vs 13,145).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 7440U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7440U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7440U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7440U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 7440U better than Ryzen 5 2600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 7440U vs Ryzen 5 2600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 7440U
The Ryzen 3 7440U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,100 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 2600
The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 7440U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 2600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7440U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7440U (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7440U uses the Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7440U scores 13,100 against the Ryzen 5 2600's 13,145 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7440U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+21% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 4 nm-67% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) |
| PassMark | 13,100 | 13,145 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 6,344 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,163 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,893 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 7440U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 7440U) / Yes (Ryzen 5 2600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | General Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













