Ryzen 3 8440U
VS
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

AMD

Ryzen 3 8440U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
3833%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
724%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
643%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
497%
#210
EPYC 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
98%
#214
Xeon 6521P
MSRP: $1250|Avg: $1250
96%
#215
Xeon E-2456
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $289
95%
#236
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $45
100%
#240
Xeon E5-4648 V3
MSRP: $169|Avg: $45
99%
#250
Xeon E5-2685 v3
MSRP: $2090|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 8440U (2023) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 8440URyzen 5 PRO 1600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 8440URyzen 5 PRO 1600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 8440U and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

AMD

Ryzen 3 8440U

The Ryzen 3 8440U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,957 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 11,875 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 8440U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8440U versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8440U (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8440U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8440U scores 11,957 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 11,875 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 3 8440U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8440U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.

FeatureRyzen 3 8440URyzen 5 PRO 1600
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+31%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
11,957
11,875
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 8440U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 8440URyzen 5 PRO 1600
Socket
FP7
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0