Ryzen 3 8440U vs Xeon E5-2667 v2

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 8440U

4 / 8

11,957

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2667 v2

8 / 16

12,186

+1.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Xeon E5-2667 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 8440U

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2667 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,957 vs 12,186).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 8440U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 3 8440U moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2667 v2 better than Ryzen 3 8440U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2667 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 8440U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2667 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2667 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2667 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2667 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (40.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 8440U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 8440U

The Ryzen 3 8440U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,957 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,186 points. Launch price was $2,300.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 8440U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8440U versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8440U (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8440U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8440U scores 11,957 against the Xeon E5-2667 v2's 12,186 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2667 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8440U vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 3 8440U	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+18%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	11,957	12,186+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 8440U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.