Ryzen 3 8440U
VS
Xeon E5-2667 v2

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Xeon E5-2667 v2

AMD

Ryzen 3 8440U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2667 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2667 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5116%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
966%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
858%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
663%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
99%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
99%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#362
Xeon E5-2667 v2
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 8440U (2023) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 8440UXeon E5-2667 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 8440UXeon E5-2667 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 8440U and Xeon E5-2667 v2

AMD

Ryzen 3 8440U

The Ryzen 3 8440U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,957 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2667 v2

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,186 points. Launch price was $2,300.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 8440U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8440U versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8440U (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8440U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8440U scores 11,957 against the Xeon E5-2667 v2's 12,186 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2667 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8440U vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v2.

FeatureRyzen 3 8440UXeon E5-2667 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+18%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-82%
22 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
11,957
12,186+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 8440U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 8440UXeon E5-2667 v2
Socket
FP7
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40