Ryzen 3 8440U vs Ryzen Z2 Go

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Ryzen Z2 Go Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 8440U

4 / 8

11,957

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Z2 Go

4 / 8

12,188

+1.9%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U

Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U

Ryzen 9 8945H

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Ryzen Z2 Go FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Ryzen Z2 Go: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 8440U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,957 vs 12,188).
❌1300% higher power demand at 28W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen Z2 Go

2025

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 28W, a 26W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 3 8440U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8440U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Z2 Go better than Ryzen 3 8440U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 3 8440U is ahead with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Z2 Go pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Z2 Go is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Z2 Go still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Z2 Go comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Z2 Go makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 8440U vs Ryzen Z2 Go Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 8440U

The Ryzen 3 8440U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,957 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Z2 Go

The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 3 8440U and Ryzen Z2 Go share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8440U versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8440U (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8440U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8440U scores 11,957 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen Z2 Go. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8440U vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.

Feature	Ryzen 3 8440U	Ryzen Z2 Go
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+9%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	4 nm-33%	6 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)	Rembrandt R (2025)
PassMark	11,957	12,188+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	5,802
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,842
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	6,073

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 8440U) / SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 3 8440U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.