
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

Xeon X5660
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs Xeon X5660 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs Xeon X5660 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs Xeon X5660: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,120 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,219 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1126.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.2 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,219 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5660 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,955 vs 5,979).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5660, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon X5660
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 60.2 PassMark/$ ($1,219 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon X5660 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs Xeon X5660 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,955 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5660
The Xeon X5660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,979 points. Launch price was $33.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X5660 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5660 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5660 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5660 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE scores 5,955 against the Xeon X5660's 5,979 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X5660. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5660.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | Xeon X5660 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+14% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 5,955 | 5,979 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5660 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | Xeon X5660 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| RAM Channels | — | 3 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5660). Primary use case: Xeon X5660 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5660 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | Xeon X5660 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE was priced at $99, while the Xeon X5660 came in at $1219. On launch pricing ($99 vs $1219), Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE was $1120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE delivers 60.2 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X5660 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE the 169.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | Xeon X5660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-92% | $1219 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.2+1129% | 4.9 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















