FX-8350 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8350 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8350 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8350

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,936 vs 5,955).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.8 vs 60.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 101.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.2 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE better than FX-8350?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-8350 is ahead with a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE comes in $100 cheaper on MSRP at $99 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that FX-8350 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 101.7% better value on MSRP (60.2 vs 29.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-8350 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8350

The FX-8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,936 points. Launch price was $199.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,955 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8350 versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE — a 15.4% clock advantage for the FX-8350 (base: 4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The FX-8350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8350 scores 5,936 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE's 5,955 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE.

Feature	FX-8350	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+17%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+1500%	512K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	5,936	5,955

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-8350	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
Socket	AM3+	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8350 was priced at $199, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE came in at $99. On launch pricing ($199 vs $99), Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE was $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8350 delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 60.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE the 67.4% better value option.

Feature	FX-8350	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
MSRP	$199	$99-50%
Performance per Dollar	29.8	60.2+102%
Release Date	2012	2018

Search FX-8350 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.