FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6

FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6 Performance Spectrum

FX-8350

8 / 8

5,936

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1505L v6

4 / 8

5,882

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8350

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1505L v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 125W vs 25W.

Xeon E3-1505L v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 125W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,882 vs 5,936).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8350 better than Xeon E3-1505L v6?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1505L v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8350 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8350 is the better buy right now. FX-8350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1505L v6 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1505L v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8350

The FX-8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,936 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E3-1505L v6

The Xeon E3-1505L v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,882 points. Launch price was $433.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1505L v6 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8350 versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505L v6 — a 62.5% clock advantage for the FX-8350. The FX-8350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1505L v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8350 scores 5,936 against the Xeon E3-1505L v6's 5,882 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-8350.

Feature	FX-8350	Xeon E3-1505L v6
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+91%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	8 MB
L2 Cache	8192 kB+700%	1 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,936	5,882