FX-8350 vs Xeon Gold 6348H

FX-8350 vs Xeon Gold 6348H Performance Spectrum

FX-8350

8 / 8

5,936

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Gold 6348H

24 / 48

5,967

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8350 vs Xeon Gold 6348H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8350 vs Xeon Gold 6348H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8350

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6348H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,936 vs 5,967).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6348H, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6348H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6348H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6348H better than FX-8350?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6348H makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8350 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6348H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6348H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6348H is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon Gold 6348H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-8350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (29.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6348H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-8350 vs Xeon Gold 6348H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8350

The FX-8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,936 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon Gold 6348H

The Xeon Gold 6348H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 5,967 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348H offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6348H has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8350 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348H — identical boost frequencies (base: 4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The FX-8350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348H uses Cooper Lake-SP (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8350 scores 5,936 against the Xeon Gold 6348H's 5,967 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6348H.

Feature	FX-8350	Xeon Gold 6348H
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+74%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	33 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+700%	1 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	5,936	5,967

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348H uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.