FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2

FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 Performance Spectrum

FX-8350

8 / 8

5,936

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1225 v2

4 / 4

6,015

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8350

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,936 vs 6,015).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌62.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 77W.

Xeon E3-1225 v2

2012

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 77W instead of 125W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1225 v2 better than FX-8350?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1225 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8350 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1225 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1225 v2 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1225 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. FX-8350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (29.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1225 v2 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8350

The FX-8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,936 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E3-1225 v2

The Xeon E3-1225 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 6,015 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8350 is built on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the FX-8350 scores 5,936 against the Xeon E3-1225 v2's 6,015 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E3-1225 v2.

Feature	FX-8350	Xeon E3-1225 v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	—
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	4 GHz	—
L2 Cache	8192 kB	—
Process	32 nm	—
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	—
PassMark	5,936	6,015+1%