
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.6 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,540 vs 14,699).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 82.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,540 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — a 27.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 14,540 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+32% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix2 (2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,540 | 14,699+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was priced at $176, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 came in at $329. On launch pricing ($176 vs $329), Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G delivers 82.6 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G the 59.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $176-47% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.6+85% | 44.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













