Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon W-1290TE

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon W-1290TE Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

4 / 8

14,540

+0.2%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1290TE

10 / 20

14,505

0.0%

Core i5-9500T

Core i5-1155G7

Core i7-1250U

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon W-1290TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon W-1290TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $376 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 214.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.6 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290TE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon W-1290TE

2020

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,505 vs 14,540).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 82.6 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G better than Xeon W-1290TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1290TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G comes in $376 cheaper on MSRP at $176 MSRP versus $552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 214.4% better value on MSRP (82.6 vs 26.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon W-1290TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,540 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-1290TE

The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 14,540 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G	Xeon W-1290TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+9%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+89%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix2 (2024)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	14,540	14,505
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,507
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,478

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G	Xeon W-1290TE
Socket	AM5	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-1290TE). The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G	Xeon W-1290TE
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was priced at $176, while the Xeon W-1290TE came in at $552. On launch pricing ($176 vs $552), Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was $376 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G delivers 82.6 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1290TE — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G the 103.5% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G	Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP	$176-68%	$552
Performance per Dollar	82.6+214%	26.3
Release Date	2024	2020

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G on Amazon

Search Xeon W-1290TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.