Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon E5-2658 v4

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

4 / 8

14,540

+0.7%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2658 v4

14 / 28

14,434

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon E5-2658 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2658 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $176 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2658 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,434 vs 14,540).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G better than Xeon E5-2658 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2658 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G comes in at an unclear MSRP at $176 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (82.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2016), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011-3, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 14/28. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,540 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,434 points. Launch price was $1,832.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 v4 — a 72.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G. The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 14,540 against the Xeon E5-2658 v4's 14,434 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2658 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G	Xeon E5-2658 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	14 / 28+250%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+113%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	35 MB+338%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	3.5 MB+250%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix2 (2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	14,540	14,434

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.