
Ryzen 5 1600X

Xeon E5-2660 v3
Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-2660 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-2660 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-2660 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 1600X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,196 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 479.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.3 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 105W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,014 vs 13,039).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2660 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 52.3 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 1600X better than Xeon E5-2660 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-2660 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 1600X
The Ryzen 5 1600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,014 points. Launch price was $249.

Xeon E5-2660 v3
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,039 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 1600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1600X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 1600X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1600X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1600X scores 13,014 against the Xeon E5-2660 v3's 13,039 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2660 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1600X vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+21% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+56% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 13,014 | 13,039 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 7,100 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 1600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 5 1600X versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 — the Ryzen 5 1600X supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2660 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 1600X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2660 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 1600X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2660 v3) — the Xeon E5-2660 v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 1600X) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2660 v3).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+25% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 1600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon E5-2660 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 1600X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2660 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 1600X targets Mainstream Desktop, Xeon E5-2660 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 1600X rivals Core i5-7600K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 1600X was priced at $249, while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 came in at $1445. On launch pricing ($249 vs $1445), Ryzen 5 1600X was $1196 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 1600X delivers 52.3 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2660 v3 — making the Ryzen 5 1600X the 141.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-83% | $1445 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.3+481% | 9.0 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













