Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-4627 v4

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 5 1600X

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5-4627 v4

10 Cores10 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2016

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-4627 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 1600X

6 / 12

13,014

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4627 v4

10 / 10

12,969

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-4627 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-4627 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 1600X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 907.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.3 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 135W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (4,500 vs 8,936).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4627 v4, which brings 10 cores / 10 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-4627 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+98.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 10 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 1600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 52.3 PassMark/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌42.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 1600X better than Xeon E5-4627 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4627 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 1600X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4627 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 98.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 1600X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 1600X comes in $2,251 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4627 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 98.6% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 907.5% better value on MSRP (52.3 vs 5.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 1600X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon E5-4627 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 1600X

The Ryzen 5 1600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,014 points. Launch price was $249.

Xeon E5-4627 v4

The Xeon E5-4627 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,969 points. Launch price was $2,225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 1600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Xeon E5-4627 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1600X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 1600X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1600X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1600X scores 13,014 against the Xeon E5-4627 v4's 12,969 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 1600X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,000 vs 1,105, a 10% lead for the Xeon E5-4627 v4 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,500 vs 8,936 (66% advantage for the Xeon E5-4627 v4). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1600X vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4627 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1600X	Xeon E5-4627 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 10+67%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+38%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	25 MB+56%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+20380%	2.5 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	13,014	12,969
Cinebench R23 Multi	7,100	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,000	1,105+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,500	8,936+99%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 1600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 5 1600X versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 — the Ryzen 5 1600X supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-4627 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 1600X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-4627 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 1600X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-4627 v4) — the Xeon E5-4627 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 1600X) and C610 (Xeon E5-4627 v4).

Feature	Ryzen 5 1600X	Xeon E5-4627 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+11%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	1536 GB+2300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 1600X) vs Yes (Xeon E5-4627 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 1600X targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 1600X rivals Core i5-7600K.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1600X	Xeon E5-4627 v4
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Mainstream Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 1600X was priced at $249, while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 came in at $2500. On launch pricing ($249 vs $2500), Ryzen 5 1600X was $2251 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 1600X delivers 52.3 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4627 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 1600X the 163.9% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1600X	Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP	$249-90%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	52.3+906%	5.2
Release Date	2017	2016

Search Ryzen 5 1600X on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4627 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.