Ryzen 5 240
VS
Core i5-13600H

Ryzen 5 240 vs Core i5-13600H

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core i5-13600H

12 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
122%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
115%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
113%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
107%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
103%
#20
Core i5-13600H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
93%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 5 240 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-13600H is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 5 240Core i5-13600H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 5 240Core i5-13600H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 240 and Core i5-13600H

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i5-13600H

The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 240 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13600H offers 12 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 240 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i5-13600H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 240 scores 23,167 against the Core i5-13600H's 23,291 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-13600H. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Core i5-13600H
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+4%
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
4.3 GHz+54%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
18 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm-43%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark
23,167
23,291
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,857
Geekbench 6 Single
2,423
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,684
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 240 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13600H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Core i5-13600H
Socket
FP8
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 240) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H). The Core i5-13600H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Core i5-13600H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High performance laptop