
Ryzen 5 240

Ryzen 7 3800XT
Ryzen 5 240 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 240 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 240 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 23,441).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 240 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3800XT better than Ryzen 5 240?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 240 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 3800XT
The Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,441 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 240 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3800XT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 240 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 240 scores 23,167 against the Ryzen 7 3800XT's 23,441 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3800XT. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800XT.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+6% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 23,167 | 23,441+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 240 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 240) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3800XT targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 240 was priced at $0, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT came in at $399. On launch pricing ($0 vs $399), Ryzen 5 240 was $399 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 58.7 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














