Ryzen 5 240 vs Xeon W-1370

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1370

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 5 240 vs Xeon W-1370 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 240 vs Xeon W-1370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 240 vs Xeon W-1370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 240

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1370, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon W-1370

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (22,948 vs 23,167).
  • Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 240 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 240 better than Xeon W-1370?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1370 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 240 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 240 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 240 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 240 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1370 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 240 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1370 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 240 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 240 vs Xeon W-1370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 240 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-1370 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-1370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 240 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 240 scores 23,167 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 240. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Xeon W-1370
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
4.3 GHz+48%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark
23,167
22,948
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 240 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Xeon W-1370
Socket
FP8
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 240 was priced at $0, while the Xeon W-1370 came in at $323. On launch pricing ($0 vs $323), Ryzen 5 240 was $323 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Xeon W-1370
MSRP
$0-100%
$323
Performance per Dollar
71.0
Release Date
2025
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.