Ryzen 5 240
VS
Xeon W-1370

Ryzen 5 240 vs Xeon W-1370

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1370

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1370

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($323) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-1370 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 5 240Xeon W-1370
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($323)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 240 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($323 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 5 240Xeon W-1370
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($323)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 240 and Xeon W-1370

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 240 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-1370 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-1370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 240 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 240 scores 23,167 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 240. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Xeon W-1370
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
4.3 GHz+48%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark
23,167
22,948
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 240 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Xeon W-1370
Socket
FP8
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 240 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1370 debuted at $323. At current prices ($0 vs $323), the Ryzen 5 240 is $323 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen 5 240Xeon W-1370
MSRP
$0-100%
$323
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$323
Performance per Dollar
71.0
Release Date
2025
2021