
Ryzen 5 2500X vs Core i5-9400F

Ryzen 5 2500X

Core i5-9400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 2500X
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-9400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 5 2500X | Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 5 2500X | Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2500X and Core i5-9400F

Ryzen 5 2500X
The Ryzen 5 2500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 9,388 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-9400F
The Core i5-9400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,462 points. Launch price was $182.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2500X packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-9400F offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core i5-9400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2500X versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9400F — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-9400F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2500X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-9400F uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2500X scores 9,388 against the Core i5-9400F's 9,462 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-9400F. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2500X vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400F.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2500X | Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+24% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+78% | 9 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,388 | 9,462 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2500X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-9400F uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2500X | Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 2500X) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400F). Primary use case: Core i5-9400F targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2500X | Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 2500X launched at $159 MSRP, while the Core i5-9400F debuted at $182. At current prices ($80 vs $80), the Core i5-9400F is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2500X delivers 117.3 pts/$ vs 118.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-9400F — making the Core i5-9400F the 0.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2500X | Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-13% | $182 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 117.3 | 118.3 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















