Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108

AMD

Ryzen 5 3400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4108

8 Cores16 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 3400G

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Costs $268 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 180.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.8 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 11 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4108, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon Silver 4108

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…+175% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 4 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (9,177 vs 9,201).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3400G better than Xeon Silver 4108?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Silver 4108 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3400G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3400G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3400G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3400G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3400G comes in $268 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 180.6% better value on MSRP (61.8 vs 22.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3400G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3400G

The Ryzen 5 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019βˆ’2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,201 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4108

The Xeon Silver 4108 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $417.

⚑

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3400G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4108 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β€” the Xeon Silver 4108 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400G versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4108 β€” a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3400G (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3400G uses the Picasso (2019βˆ’2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4108 uses Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3400G scores 9,201 against the Xeon Silver 4108's 9,177 β€” a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3400G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400G vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4108.

FeatureRyzen 5 3400GXeon Silver 4108
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+40%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+106%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
11 MB+175%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+6300%
8 MB
Process
12 nm-14%
14 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019βˆ’2022)
Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018)
PassMark
9,201
9,177
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4108 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3400GXeon Silver 4108
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 3400G was priced at $149, while the Xeon Silver 4108 came in at $417. On launch pricing ($149 vs $417), Ryzen 5 3400G was $268 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3400G delivers 61.8 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4108 β€” making the Ryzen 5 3400G the 94.9% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 3400GXeon Silver 4108
MSRP
$149-64%
$417
Performance per Dollar
61.8+181%
22.0
Release Date
2019
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.