
Ryzen 5 3400G

Xeon Silver 4108
Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3400G
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $268 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
- β Delivers 180.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.8 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 11 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4108, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon Silver 4108
2017Why buy it
- β +175% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (9,177 vs 9,201).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- β30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3400G better than Xeon Silver 4108?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4108 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3400G
The Ryzen 5 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019β2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,201 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4108
The Xeon Silver 4108 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $417.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3400G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4108 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Xeon Silver 4108 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400G versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4108 β a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3400G (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3400G uses the Picasso (2019β2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4108 uses Skylake (server) (2017β2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3400G scores 9,201 against the Xeon Silver 4108's 9,177 β a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3400G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400G vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4108.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3400G | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+106% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 11 MB+175% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+6300% | 8 MB |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019β2022) | Skylake (server) (2017β2018) |
| PassMark | 9,201 | 9,177 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4108 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3400G | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3400G was priced at $149, while the Xeon Silver 4108 came in at $417. On launch pricing ($149 vs $417), Ryzen 5 3400G was $268 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3400G delivers 61.8 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4108 β making the Ryzen 5 3400G the 94.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3400G | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-64% | $417 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.8+181% | 22.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













