
Core i3-1125G4

Ryzen 5 3400G
Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 3400G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 3400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1125G4
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (48 EU), while Ryzen 5 3400G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 5 3400G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,201 vs 9,284).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Core i3-1125G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1125G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-1125G4 better than Ryzen 5 3400G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1125G4
The Core i3-1125G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,284 points. Launch price was $281.


Ryzen 5 3400G
The Ryzen 5 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,201 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-1125G4 and Ryzen 5 3400G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-1125G4 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400G — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3400G (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i3-1125G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 3400G uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1125G4 scores 9,284 against the Ryzen 5 3400G's 9,201 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-1125G4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-1125G4 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400G.
| Feature | Core i3-1125G4 | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+85% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 9,284 | 9,201 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,112 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,560 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,770 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1125G4 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-1125G4 | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1125G4) / not specified (Ryzen 5 3400G). The Core i3-1125G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (48 EU)), while the Ryzen 5 3400G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1125G4 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-1125G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Feature | Core i3-1125G4 | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics (48 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












