Core i3-1125G4 vs Core i7-4930K

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Core i7-4930K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Core i7-4930K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1125G4

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (48 EU), while Core i7-4930K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4930K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,284 vs 9,379).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Core i7-4930K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $670 MSRP, while Core i3-1125G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1125G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4930K better than Core i3-1125G4?

Yes. Core i7-4930K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4930K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4930K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4930K is the better buy right now. Core i7-4930K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $670 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1125G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Core i7-4930K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1125G4

The Core i3-1125G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,284 points. Launch price was $281.

Core i7-4930K

The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1125G4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-4930K offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-4930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-1125G4 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-4930K (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-1125G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-4930K uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1125G4 scores 9,284 against the Core i7-4930K's 9,379 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4930K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-1125G4 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K.

Feature	Core i3-1125G4	Core i7-4930K
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.4 GHz+70%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark	9,284	9,379+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,112	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,560	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,770	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1125G4 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-4930K uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1125G4	Core i7-4930K
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1125G4) / not specified (Core i7-4930K). The Core i3-1125G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (48 EU)), while the Core i7-4930K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1125G4 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-1125G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.