Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 2500X

Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 2500X Performance Spectrum

Core i3-1125G4

4 / 8

9,284

0.0%

9,388

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 2500X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 2500X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1125G4

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (48 EU), while Ryzen 5 2500X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2500X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,284 vs 9,388).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 5 2500X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $159 MSRP, while Core i3-1125G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1125G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 2500X better than Core i3-1125G4?

Yes. Ryzen 5 2500X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 2500X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2500X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 2500X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 2500X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $159 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (59.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1125G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 2500X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1125G4

The Core i3-1125G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,284 points. Launch price was $281.

Ryzen 5 2500X

The Ryzen 5 2500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 9,388 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-1125G4 and Ryzen 5 2500X share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-1125G4 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2500X — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2500X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-1125G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 2500X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1125G4 scores 9,284 against the Ryzen 5 2500X's 9,388 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 2500X. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-1125G4 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2500X.

Feature	Core i3-1125G4	Ryzen 5 2500X
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-17%	12 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	9,284	9,388+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,112	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,560	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,770	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1125G4 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 2500X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1125G4	Ryzen 5 2500X
Socket	FCBGA1449	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1125G4) / not specified (Ryzen 5 2500X). The Core i3-1125G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (48 EU)), while the Ryzen 5 2500X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1125G4 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-1125G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.