Core i3-1125G4 vs Xeon Gold 5222

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Xeon Gold 5222 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Xeon Gold 5222: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1125G4

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (48 EU), while Xeon Gold 5222 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5222 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,284 vs 9,348).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).

Xeon Gold 5222

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1125G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5222 better than Core i3-1125G4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 5222 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-1125G4 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5222 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5222 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5222 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 5222 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1125G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1125G4 vs Xeon Gold 5222 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1125G4

The Core i3-1125G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,284 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon Gold 5222

The Xeon Gold 5222 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,348 points. Launch price was $1,221.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-1125G4 and Xeon Gold 5222 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-1125G4 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5222 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5222 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i3-1125G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon Gold 5222 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1125G4 scores 9,284 against the Xeon Gold 5222's 9,348 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5222. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-1125G4 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5222.

Feature	Core i3-1125G4	Xeon Gold 5222
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.8 GHz+90%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16.5 MB+106%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	4 MB+220%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	9,284	9,348
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,112	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,560	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,770	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1125G4 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5222 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1125G4	Xeon Gold 5222
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1125G4) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5222). The Core i3-1125G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (48 EU)), while the Xeon Gold 5222 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1125G4 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-1125G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.