Core i3-1125G4 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Core i3-1125G4
Xeon E5-2620 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-1125G4 is positioned at rank 651 and the Xeon E5-2620 v4 is on rank 304, so the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-1125G4
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2620 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-1125G4 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($410) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-1125G4 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($410) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1125G4 and Xeon E5-2620 v4
Core i3-1125G4
The Core i3-1125G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,284 points. Launch price was $281.
Xeon E5-2620 v4
The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,255 points. Launch price was $417.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1125G4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-1125G4 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-1125G4 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-1125G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1125G4 scores 9,284 against the Xeon E5-2620 v4's 9,255 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-1125G4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-1125G4 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2620 v4.
| Feature | Core i3-1125G4 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 20 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB+60% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,284 | 9,255 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,112 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,560 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,770 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1125G4 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2620 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-1125G4) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2620 v4). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-1125G4) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2620 v4) — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i3-1125G4) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v4).
| Feature | Core i3-1125G4 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1536 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1125G4) / not specified (Xeon E5-2620 v4). The Core i3-1125G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (48 EU)), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1125G4 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-1125G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Feature | Core i3-1125G4 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics (48 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-1125G4 and Xeon E5-2620 v4
