
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $86 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon W-1250
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,671 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($285 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon W-1250
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $86 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,671 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($285 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon W-1250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 342 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-1250


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-1250
Xeon W-1250
The Xeon W-1250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,671 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-1250 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-1250 — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1250 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-1250's 13,671 — a 25.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1250.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+167% | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 17,685+29% | 13,671 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1250 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-1250). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1250 debuted at $285. On MSRP ($199 vs $285), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 48.0 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1250 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 59.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-30% | $285 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+85% | 48.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












