Ryzen 5 7235HS vs Xeon E5-2618L v4

Ryzen 5 7235HS vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 7235HS

4 / 8

12,379

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2618L v4

10 / 20

12,429

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 7235HS vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 7235HS vs Xeon E5-2618L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 7235HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2618L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,379 vs 12,429).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2618L v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $779 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7235HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2618L v4 better than Ryzen 5 7235HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2618L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7235HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2618L v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2618L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2618L v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2618L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $779 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7235HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of the older platform. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 7235HS vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 7235HS

The Ryzen 5 7235HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,379 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7235HS packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7235HS versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — a 62.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7235HS. The Ryzen 5 7235HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7235HS scores 12,379 against the Xeon E5-2618L v4's 12,429 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2618L v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7235HS vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7235HS	Xeon E5-2618L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+91%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	25 MB+213%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2.5 MB+400%
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	12,379	12,429