PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700E

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.4% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 7235HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $259 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7235HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7235HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7235HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700E across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,379 vs 12,575).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700E

2019

Ryzen 5 7235HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.4% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 7235HS needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $259 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7235HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7235HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700E across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,379 vs 12,575).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700E better than Ryzen 5 7235HS?

Yes. Core i7-9700E is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 26.4% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700E is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 26.4% more average FPS across 37 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700E is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700E is the smarter buy today. Core i7-9700E is at an unclear MSRP at $259 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 26.4% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (48.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7235HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700E Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7235HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700E	Ryzen 5 7235HS
1080p
low	171 FPS	161 FPS
medium	146 FPS	139 FPS
high	120 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	145 FPS	137 FPS
medium	122 FPS	116 FPS
high	100 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	63 FPS
medium	72 FPS	56 FPS
high	57 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i7-9700E Open Ryzen 5 7235HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700E	Ryzen 5 7235HS
1080p
low	309 FPS	269 FPS
medium	267 FPS	232 FPS
high	249 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	180 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	232 FPS
medium	246 FPS	200 FPS
high	230 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	222 FPS	181 FPS
medium	200 FPS	160 FPS
high	190 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	165 FPS	104 FPS

Open Core i7-9700E Open Ryzen 5 7235HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700E	Ryzen 5 7235HS
1080p
low	314 FPS	309 FPS
medium	314 FPS	309 FPS
high	314 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	314 FPS	309 FPS
medium	314 FPS	309 FPS
high	314 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	309 FPS
4K
low	314 FPS	309 FPS
medium	314 FPS	305 FPS
high	314 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	271 FPS	221 FPS

Open Core i7-9700E Open Ryzen 5 7235HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700E	Ryzen 5 7235HS
1080p
low	314 FPS	309 FPS
medium	314 FPS	309 FPS
high	314 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	314 FPS	309 FPS
medium	314 FPS	309 FPS
high	314 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	309 FPS
4K
low	314 FPS	309 FPS
medium	314 FPS	309 FPS
high	314 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	309 FPS

Open Core i7-9700E Open Ryzen 5 7235HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700E and Ryzen 5 7235HS

Core i7-9700E

The Core i7-9700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,575 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 5 7235HS

The Ryzen 5 7235HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,379 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7235HS offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-9700E versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7235HS — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700E (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700E uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7235HS uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700E scores 12,575 against the Ryzen 5 7235HS's 12,379 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-9700E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700E vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7235HS.

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Ryzen 5 7235HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+5%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	12,575+2%	12,379
Cinebench R23 Multi	6,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,172	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,802	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700E uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7235HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Ryzen 5 7235HS
Socket	LGA1151	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-9700E) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7235HS). The Core i7-9700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 7235HS requires a dedicated GPU.