PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700E vs Xeon W-2133 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700E vs Xeon W-2133: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700E

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
✅Costs $358 less on MSRP ($259 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Delivers 137.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 20.4 PassMark/$ ($259 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2133, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2133

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,000 vs 6,800).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.4 vs 48.6 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700E better than Xeon W-2133?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2133 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 13.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700E is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700E comes in $358 cheaper on MSRP at $259 MSRP versus $617 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 137.5% better value on MSRP (48.6 vs 20.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017), 45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700E vs Xeon W-2133 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700E

The Core i7-9700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,575 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-2133

The Xeon W-2133 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $617.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-2133 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-9700E versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-2133 — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700E (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-9700E uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2133 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700E scores 12,575 against the Xeon W-2133's 12,615 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W-2133. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 6,800 vs 6,000 (12.5% advantage for the Core i7-9700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,172 vs 1,292, a 9.7% lead for the Xeon W-2133 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,802 vs 6,647 (2.3% advantage for the Core i7-9700E). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700E vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2133.

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Xeon W-2133
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+13%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+45%	8.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	12,575	12,615
Cinebench R23 Multi	6,800+13%	6,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,172	1,292+10%
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,802+2%	6,647

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700E uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2133 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Xeon W-2133 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700E) vs 4 (Xeon W-2133). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700E) vs 48 (Xeon W-2133) — the Xeon W-2133 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,H370,Q370,Z370,Z390 (Core i7-9700E) and C422 (Xeon W-2133).

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Xeon W-2133
Socket	LGA1151	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	512 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-2133 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-9700E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2133). The Core i7-9700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon W-2133 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-2133 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2133 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Xeon W-2133
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700E was priced at $259, while the Xeon W-2133 came in at $617. On launch pricing ($259 vs $617), Core i7-9700E was $358 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700E delivers 48.6 pts/$ vs 20.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2133 — making the Core i7-9700E the 81.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Xeon W-2133
MSRP	$259-58%	$617
Performance per Dollar	48.6+138%	20.4
Release Date	2019	2017

Search Core i7-9700E on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2133 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.