Core i7-9700E
VS
Core Ultra 7 164U

Core i7-9700E vs Core Ultra 7 164U

Intel

Core i7-9700E

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 164U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700E

#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
106%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
106%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
105%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
105%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
105%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
105%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
105%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
103%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
47%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
103%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
102%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
102%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
101%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
101%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
44%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
41%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
101%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
100%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
41%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
100%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
100%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
99%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
40%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
39%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
98%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
98%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
98%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
96%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
95%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
32%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 164U

#663
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
930%
#664
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
916%
#665
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
841%
#666
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
837%
#667
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
829%
#669
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
801%
#670
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
768%
#671
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
767%
#672
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
746%
#675
Core Ultra 7 164U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#681
Core i3-N305
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 7 164U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-9700E in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-9700ECore Ultra 7 164U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-U (2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-9700ECore Ultra 7 164U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 7 164U

Intel

Core i7-9700E

The Core i7-9700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,575 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 164U

The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 164U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-9700E versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700E uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 164U uses Meteor Lake-U (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700E scores 12,575 against the Core Ultra 7 164U's 12,625 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 164U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 6,800 vs 8,766 (25.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,172 vs 2,131, a 58.1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 164U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,802 vs 8,973 (27.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-9700ECore Ultra 7 164U
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
12 / 14+50%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+136%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+700%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Meteor Lake-U (2023)
PassMark
12,575
12,625
Cinebench R23 Multi
6,800
8,766+29%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,172
2,131+82%
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,802
8,973+32%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700E uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 164U uses FCBGA2551 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700E versus LPDDR5x-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 164U — the Core Ultra 7 164U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700E) vs 12 (Core Ultra 7 164U) — the Core i7-9700E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,H370,Q370,Z370,Z390 (Core i7-9700E) and Meteor Lake-U (Core Ultra 7 164U).

FeatureCore i7-9700ECore Ultra 7 164U
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA2551
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
LPDDR5x-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-9700E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 164U). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700E) and Intel Arc (Core Ultra 7 164U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.

FeatureCore i7-9700ECore Ultra 7 164U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Intel Arc
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Enthusiast