Ryzen 5 7400F vs Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD

Ryzen 5 7400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
Ryzen family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······

Ryzen 5 7400F vs Ryzen 7 8840HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 7400F vs Ryzen 7 8840HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 7400F vs Ryzen 7 8840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 7400F

2025

Why buy it

  • +1.5% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 25,529).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7400F better than Ryzen 7 8840HS?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 8840HS is ahead with a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7400F pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 7400F also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 7400F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 7400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 8840HS is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (170.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 7400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 7400F vs Ryzen 7 8840HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 5 7400F

The Ryzen 5 7400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,529 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 8840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7400F uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7400F scores 25,529 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 7400F. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

FeatureRyzen 5 7400FRyzen 7 8840HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
5.1 GHz+9%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+12%
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
25,529+1%
25,156
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 7400FRyzen 7 8840HS
Socket
AM5
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0