Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 23,150).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

2017

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1920X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7640HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7640HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 7640HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7640HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 22,921 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7640HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+19%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+23%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,921	23,150

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.